Page 1 of 1
Back to work
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:41 pm
by ntnll
Hi guys,
as many of you know I've been a bit "busy" in the last months, just getting back to the normality, and trying to take back control of the plugin development.
I'll push a not relevant update in the next weeks, I want just test the plugin updater.
Also wondering, as I didn't had chance to follow the threads, neither to flight and follow the last XPlane updates, if you guys can give me a quick feedback about your current experience with the plugin, and mention any relevant bug you think deserve to be discussed.
Please don't mention any old (<60 124thATC versions) or XPlane beta-related issues. XPlane betas are generally not supported, and obviously I expect that everybody is using the last 124thATC .60 version.
Cheers,
a.
Re: Back to work
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:53 pm
by vittop
Hi Antonello,
Please find at this link:
http://forum.124thatc.matacchieri.eu/vi ... 4886#p4921
these were my last remarks about data exchange between plane's FMS and 124th ATC plugin. In my opinion it needs to be fixed since I believe than many people like me creates a flight plan outside XP11, i.e. using websites like RouteFinder or Skyvector...
http://rfinder.asalink.net/free/
https://skyvector.com/
... in conjunction with X-Planetools...
https://x-planetools.com/fltawareparser.html
... to produce a flight plan file to be imported into XP11 plane's FMS.
Thanx
Vittop
Re: Back to work
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:31 am
by ntnll
Thanks vittop, I'll have a look into it, many thanks for the feedback.
a.
Re: Back to work
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:47 am
by sneakysnk
Hi Antonello,
The main bug I encounter is that ATC regularly chooses wrong runways so I'm "forced" to choose runways and SID/STAR so it's less immersive.
And another thing that's not really a bug: I find some readback too long. Pilots tend to readback with a summary version of the original statement of the ATC (I hope I'm clear enough, it's early in the morning and my english is not fully activated

).
I was wondering if you'd consider sharing the source code so I can see if I can tweak some things and maybe share those with you so you can merge them into the master project if you like it?
Anyway, thank you for the plugin, it's the best out there !

Re: Back to work
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:10 pm
by ntnll
sneakysnk wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:47 am
Hi Antonello,
The main bug I encounter is that ATC regularly chooses wrong runways so I'm "forced" to choose runways and SID/STAR so it's less immersive.
And another thing that's not really a bug: I find some readback too long. Pilots tend to readback with a summary version of the original statement of the ATC (I hope I'm clear enough, it's early in the morning and my english is not fully activated

).
I was wondering if you'd consider sharing the source code so I can see if I can tweak some things and maybe share those with you so you can merge them into the master project if you like it?
Anyway, thank you for the plugin, it's the best out there !
Hi mate! I'm not allowed to share the source code, as the original project wasn't opened. Well, almost nothing has left from the orginal code, but I suppose that I would not allow anyway. With wrong runway do you mean wrong according to the wind? What you're log says about the wind and runway calculation?
I'll have a look to the dialogs, thank you for the heads up mate,
a.